|
Brief
|
Scholten
Cochrane review
2003
|
|
Title
|
Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome
|
|
Author
|
Scholten RJPM, Gerritsen AAM, Uitdehaag BMJ, van Geldere D, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM.
|
|
Reference
|
The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003
|
|
Summary
|
9 ECTR (single- or double-portal) vs OCTR:
equally effective, ECTR return to work/ADL approx 15d sooner, ECTR more transient nerve problems, OCTR more wound problems.
3 limited OCTR vs standard OCTR:
equally effective, 2 showed sl incr scar tenderness
4 OCTR vs additional neurolysis/epineurotomy:
no difference
|
|
Critique
|
Pooling impeded by the vast variety of outcome measures and insufficient data. Essentially qualitative review.
|
|
Take home message
|
No strong evidence that alternative surgical procedures (ECTR, neurolysis or limited OCTR) are superior to standard OCTR.
|